Deaf geographies, and other worlds.

It’s only polite to ask Deaf people *before* we co-produce with them… surely?


The last few weeks have me thinking about the idea of ‘co-production’.

Actually, that’s wrong, I’ve been thinking about co-production on and off for the last ten years (without calling it that) but the last few weeks have brought some questions to the fore. I’m sure more thoughts will come out in time, particularly since things in projects that I’m involved with are evolving, raising challenges and questions that I want to make public.

But, for the moment, here’s a thought.

It’s really important for universities to be co-producing with the Deaf community. REALLY important. Actually, if something that was said at a conference recently is true, it’s inevitable. Since the work that we (hearing academics) do involves information from and knowledge about the Deaf community, it is co-produced, whether we, or the Deaf community like it or not. (This question of ‘liking it’ isn’t inevitable. There are things that we can do, but the difficulties will be explored in a future post).

So, the question shifts to being ‘aware’ that we are co-producing and do it as best we can.

So, how – and here’s my question – can we be thinking of projects that are designed to be co-produced with the Deaf community when we’ve not even asked them if they’d like to be involved first?

(I’ll set aside the question of ‘how much’ of a project needs to be ‘Deaf’ and how much ‘hearing’ for the moment.)

How can we think of a project, think that it’s an interesting idea, think that it’s a good idea for the community, think that we know how to set it up… and then write the proposal, get the funding… all without the community being involved, and then expect the community to gratefully leap into a ready exploration of co-production with us?

We can’t, surely. I mean, if the Deaf community did the same; dreamed up a project, wrote it, went off and got funding, all without telling us. And then suddenly turned up at the door of the university and expected us to understand that it was a project that was ’empowering’ and that they expected us to be grateful and immediately get involved… I can imagine the response.

In fact, I’m not even sure there would be a response. More a puzzled ‘what?’

Before writing people into a co-production proposal, it’s only polite to ask… surely?

3 comments on “It’s only polite to ask Deaf people *before* we co-produce with them… surely?

  1. Pingback: Mike Gulliver: Academics should consult Deaf people before we plan to co-produce research with them. Surely? (BSL) | The Limping Chicken

  2. Karen Bowler
    September 19, 2014

    As a deaf person with a doctorate I’m very tempted to go ahead and dream up a project, write the proposal, go get the funding and turn up right on your doorstep

    • Mike Gulliver
      September 19, 2014

      Karen, Please do 🙂 I think it would be fascinating to see what the university would do in that situation. To be honest, they’d probably be delighted to take the funds and find you a desk to work at.

      My problem is that there is an expectation on the part of the university that the Deaf community should be ‘grateful’ for any intervention.

      I’ve long wanted to set up a project where the Deaf community ‘researches the university’, and asks ‘why it is?’ and ‘what it’s for?’ and ‘how it works?’.

      I think that would be fascinating to see something as taken for granted as the university through the eyes of the community.

      What is your PhD in?

Comments are closed.


This entry was posted on September 8, 2014 by in Academic.
%d bloggers like this: